School Closing vs. District Consolidation: Which is Better for Your Child’s Education?

North Shore, South Shore, all around Long Island there’s talk of school closings to save district’s money in these dire economic times.

North Shore, South Shore, all around Long Island there’s talk of school closings to save district’s money in these dire economic times.

Several school systems, including West Islip, North Bellmore, and Smithtown, have already put school-chopping proposals on the table.  And more are sure to follow in a weak economy with decreased state aid and a 2 percent budget cap on the horizon for 2012-2013.

Whenever school closings are proposed, parents get upset. For the most part, they are dedicated to their home schools and don’t want their children to be used as pawns in school-shuttering plans. They like their principals and their teachers and the familiarity of their neighborhood schools. But the financial burden is becoming almost insurmountable. So what are districts to do?

According to Martin R. Cantor, CPA, Ed.D, the director of The Long Island Center for Socio-Economic Policy, consolidation of Long Island’s school districts could save millions of dollars a year and would still preserve local control. And just this week, New York State’s new education commissioner, Dr. John B. King, Jr., agreed with the idea for Long Island and Westchester.

Dr. Cantor, a former director of the Long Island Economic and Social Policy Institute at Dowling College, estimates that the 47 school districts in western Suffolk County could save $32 million a year by forming five town-wide systems.

Under his proposal, the merger of dozens of local districts would allow the elimination of the vast majority of school superintendents, business and personnel officials. And he would give principals the power to budget and hire. Although consolidation has been proposed many times in the past, Dr. Cantor believes the time may now be right if parents want to stop the trend of increased class sizes and reduced student services.

Dr. King, on the other hand, is in favor of a more sweeping countywide consolidation. He points to county systems in similar suburbs, such as those in Maryland and Virginia, which have comfortable, well-educated residents.  

Merging districts has always been a political hot potato and no one expects school boards and central office administrators to voluntarily give up their power. Yet Dr. Cantor says he is trying to raise awareness that there is an alternative to the yearly decimation of educational programs and services.

By the way, Newsday this week supported the concept of consolidation. It sided with Cantor’s proposal for town-wide district consolidation, saying the commissioner’s proposal was too severe for Long Island. The paper noted the historical hardcore resistance to mergers on Long Island, citing Elwood’s failed attempt last year to find merger partners. But it says the state could offer incentives to make the idea more palatable.

It is up to parents to lead the charge if consolidation is to become a reality. As Newsday put it, “The solution lies in making parents understand that as times get hard and the recently passed tax cap kicks in, the only way to save beloved programs threatened by tight budgets is efficiency. Taxpayers who really want to see kids get the best in education and activities may have to let go of their dedication to tiny schools and tiny districts.

“As money gets tighter, things change. If the other choice is a drop-off in educational offerings, parents and taxpayers should demand that districts look hard at consolidation rather than fight it. Once they do, the process will be halfway home -- and everyone will be closer to a more efficient and equitable way to educate our children.”

Dr. Cantor offers some reassurance to parents who are frightened by the prospect of consolidation by emphasizing that it “gives parents control of their local schools; children remain in the schools that the parents moved into the neighborhoods for. Parents will have more say in education because their local principals will be in charge of the budget and student achievement, not isolated administrators. Classes would remain smaller and teachers preserved.”

He added that the factors that would change with consolidation would not impact the students’ school experience but rather are “budget items that have no role in the children’s education; in fact it directs more school budget dollars to the classroom.”

And, Dr. Cantor stressed, “the plan preserves the neighborhood school. Children are not transported to other schools and districts. Nothing changes but better education at lower costs.”

I urge all parents to read Dr. Cantor’s consolidation plan on his website, www.martincantor.com. Click the publication link; the paper is at the bottom of the list.

Become familiar with all of the issues related to this topic. Deep cuts are on the horizon in all districts. Be informed, and decide for yourself what’s best for your children’s education!

For more information from Dr. Meryl Ain, please visit:





This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Engineer and Mom December 14, 2011 at 08:20 PM
Those who are suggesting consolidation will cause unemployment are using scare tactics. When a school is shut down, at least 50 people lose jobs. If an administration is shut down, there are maybe 20. The salaries of administrators are much higher than the teachers, and usually they are closer to retirement age. This would not hurt nearly as much as is being insinuated. Also, as I see it, after consolidation community-based "districts" would still seem to exist, as far as sports and community spirit, as they evolve from feeder elementary schools leading up to high schools. The administration would just be a larger umbrella which addresses several high schools and their feeder schools. As a Sachem resident, I am appalled at the top-heavy administration. There are more administrators now than there were in the 80s, when the district handled at least 50% more students. The student-administrator ratio is probably double what it had been. And administrators don't add value to the children's education, not through sports, services, extra-curriculars, or actual teaching. I am all for cutting administrators, whether through actions of the school board or consolidation. I don't agree with the "Town-based" idea, simply because Sachem has 3 towns represented, and it would splinter the district. But a geographical split would have merit.
Charles Smith December 15, 2011 at 02:21 PM
consolidation should at least be a long term goal. How much simpler would life be if there was 1 district per township? multiple high schools in the same district also would allow for schools to specialize and students could apply for specialties that interest them.
Joycee December 16, 2011 at 02:55 PM
Consolidation is definitely something small districts like Babylon need to consider. I would like to know from Mr. Cantor why he believes we will still be able to keep our neighborhood schools intact. If so, who needs all of the top-heavy administration?
Martin Cantor December 17, 2011 at 01:53 PM
Hi all..the fact is the higher property taxes are subsidizing jobs that taxpayers can't afford and decisions have to be made where dollars are most effectively spent. Should they be on the classroom and teachers or on administrators and boards of education who do not impact children's education? These are the choices. Another fact is that the global economy has shifted industry sectors and eliminated others; that is what change unfortunately brings. Finally, the administrators who would no longer be needed a consolidation plan could compete for building principal jobs thereby enhancing the pool of qualified candidates for principal. All this benefits children and their learning..best Marty Cantor, CPA, Ed.D
Martin Cantor December 17, 2011 at 01:57 PM
Joycee..Hi this is Martin Cantor. Go to my web site www.martincantor.com and hit the publications link and the plan is the last one listed. That plan when inacted calls for building principals to be responsible for budgets, hiring, and academic improvement. It calls for keeping local schools, not the Princeton Plan which eliminates them and not like Smithtown and West Islip which are closing schools. The power to create a school district that meets community and student needs rests with the voters, who I am very compfortable with their understanding that neighborhood schools are still the way to go..best..Marty Cantor


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »